Star Spangled Banner banned in Public Schools? (Continued)

There needs to be some sort of accountbality for these "activist judges" who chose to legislate from the bench. Before Roe V. Wade, many states had passed laws banning abortions, now because of the Supreme Court ruling that murdering unborn children is legal, today abortion is the leading killer in America. Abortion kills more than cancer, heart disease and AIDS combined. I hear all the rhetoric from the abortion rights activists, from the cliche' "Don't put your laws on MY body" to the "It is my body, I should be able to chose" and I agree in principle with their logic but not with their motives. I do not think the government should legislate what people do with their own bodies, but in my opinion that does not justify murdering innocent babies because having that baby might be inconvienent or too much responsibility. Instead of murdering that innocent human life, why not give the baby up for adoption, there are many thousands of people who would love to have children but for various reasons cannot. Using the logic of the rhetoric "Take your laws off of my body", well then I guess we should legalize the rapeing of women because they don't want to have "our" laws on their body. Before you accuse me of advocating rape, I was merely using that to make a point. I think any man who forces himself onto a woman for sexual reasons is dispicable and belongs in prison.

I am afraid that no matter how many states pass laws against homosexual marriage, that unless we either pass a constitutional ammendment banning it or take action to bar the supreme court from hearing any such subject, we will see the day when these activist judges who chose to legislate from the bench will strike down the laws of the states. Last year in Minnesota, a majority of the people were in favor of banning Gay marriage but the Democartic Farmer Labor party controlled state senate wouldn't even let the bill come up for vote on the floor. They dodged the issue because they knew that if they voted against they would likely be voted out of office in 2006, well I have a news flash, by not acting on banning Gay marriage in Minnesota, you ignored the majority of the people and we will vote you out of office in 2006.

Like I said at the begining of this post I strongly believe there needs to be accountablity for the actions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Otherwise if the election in 2008 is as close as it was in 2000 or the democrat candidate imagines some sort of reason that every vote wasn't counted, we very well could see these liberal judges swing the presidency away from the way the PEOPLE voted and to the way their friends the Liberal Democrats would want it.

Also I am afraid that the Supreme Court will side with the Anti-american Communist Leftists Union in the case of the Ten Commandments and that will send us further down the slippery slope to being USSA (United Socialist States of America), as it seems the liberal wing of the democratic party desires, becuase it seems to want everyone to depend on the Government. Based on the rhetoric I hear coming from the Dems, they seem to want every one to pay in most of their income to the Government and the Government will re-distribute the wealth, like is done in Communism.

I've done enough ranting for now...